Oscar Wilde, "The Critic as Artist"

Throughout Oscar Wilde's "The Critic as Artist," two speakers, Gilbert and Ernest, contemplate the highest form of criticism. After recognizing that criticism demands more cultivation than creation, Gilbert defends the idea that "the highest criticism really is, the record of one's own soul"(1027). He begins by tracing the whole system of art criticism to the ancient Greeks and continues to make the argument that the true critic is unfair, insincere, and not rational.



Part One of " The Critic as Artist" place criticism above creation. Gilbert argues that "criticism demands infinitely more cultivation than creation does" (1022). The process of analyses and though requires a larger amount of investment than the process of creating art. The instinct of creation is repetition, while contemplation produces innovation. Only through the critic can art develop. While Part One deals with the importance of criticism, Part Two gives a deeper insight on how to be a true critic.



At the end of the dialogue Ernest summarizes Gilberts key points, stating "that the true critic is unfair, insincere, and not rational" (1058). Gilbert defends the notion that a true critic should be unfair by explaining that "it is one's business...to have preferences, and when one has preferences once ceases to be fair" (1047). It is completely acceptable for the critic to be unfair as long as they do not carry prejudices, which obscure their vision of the artwork. " An unbiased opinion is always absolutely valueless," because the person lacks the passion for the art (1047). Gilbert also states that a true critic should learn to " recognize that the sphere of Art and the sphere of Ethics are absolutely distinct and separate" (1048). In other words a critic should learn to remove his personal morals and values from the art he is criticizing. Sincerity and fairness fall under the category of morals which is why there is not place for them in criticism. A critic can not be rational because art is not rational. Beauty is not rational. Love and passion are not rational. If a critic approaches a piece of art with a rational eye it will only limit his ability of reacting to the work of art.

Gilbert explains to Ernest that, "temperament is the primary requisite for the critic" (1049). With temperament the critic has the ability to approach a piece of art and discover something new and as creative as the piece of art itself. Essentially the primary job of the critic is to take a piece of art work and try to shed new light upon it. The criticism they then create has the ability and in its highest for is a new and even greater piece of art itself. The critic uses the piece of art as a starting point for even greater creation. He deals with the art work internally rather than expressively. If art mirrors man in all his infinite variety the critic allows the audience to see their mirror image through his criticism.

“At Close Distance: Labyrinth of Self” (33 E Congress Exhibition)

Columbia College Chicago’s latest gallery exhibition “ At Close Distance: Labyrinth of Self,” at 33 E Congress features interdisciplinary artwork from Columbia’s own graduate students. All of the work explores the question: how do our journeys, from past to present, shape our beliefs, our identities, and our relationships to our environments? Laura Elayne Miller is the curator of the exhibit, along with assistant curator Eliza Fogel. The exhibit opened on November 11, 2009 and will be open until February 13, 2010, on Mon-Wed & Fri from 9-5 and Thurs from 9-7. A reception was held on November 13, 2009. The space itself is not very large and without the question presented by the artists much of the work would not seem to go together.

When you enter the gallery everything is set up in a rectangle, with art work placed along the outside on the walls and then some more work is place in the center of the room. Featured artists include Jennifer Hines, Colleen McGann, Kelli Cousins, and Teresa Pankratz. One of my favorite pieces of the entire exhibit would be the work of Jennifer Hines. She presents acrylic paintings on digital prints, such as her Personal Growth: purple roots with leaves piece. The work displays a girl sitting in the fetal position with intricate leaf line designs extending from her hands and feet. The line work appears to be very precise and clean, with vibrant colors of orange, green, and purple. Another interesting piece includes the work of Teresa Pankratz, called Marissa learns of the fire: She’d had no premonition. The work consists of hand cut intaglio prints, which were placed into a mixed media construction. The piece explores objects lost within a fire and allows the viewer to understand the significance of small objects, such as a nail clipper, and how those objects effected and shaped our lives. Both of these artists seemed to go along with the theme of the entire exhibit.

Some of the less appealing art included that of Kelli Cousins, who merely set up three which canvas boards, and made some sounds on a tape player to accompany it. The viewer is supposed to walk up to the piece and listen to the sounds while looking at the white boards. Personally, this piece did nothing for me. The sounds she made were awkward and random. They seemed like a poor attempt at wind and other abstract noises. Not only are the noises horrible, they last forever, wasting at least 5 minutes of valuable time. Some of the other art included photographs, and other three dimensional objects. The gallery also displayed little television screens, with headphones, but sadly none of the screens were working.

Most of the work gave me no insight to the relationship between the past and present, or whatever deeper questions the exhibit was trying to ask. The exhibit is a good way for students to get there work seen, but it also makes Columbia look bad. Besides one or two pieces, the rest of the work seemed pretty armature. Maybe the television screens would have been impressive if they had been working.

"The Cleveland Show" (Season 1 Episode 1: "Pilot," Fox)

"The Cleveland Show", a "Family Guy" spin-off or a mere duplicate? The show airs Sundays during Fox's Animation Domination line-up of Seth Macfarlane shows, including "Family Guy" and "American Dad." The show features Cleveland (voiced by Mike Henry) who recently divorced his wife ans sets out to move to California with his son Cleveland Jr. (Kevin Michael Richardson). On the way they make a stop in Stoolbend, Virginia, where Cleveland reunites with his high school crush Donna (Sanna Lathan).

At first glance the only obvious difference between "The Cleveland Show" and "Family Guy" would be that "The Cleveland Show" features an African-American family. Without this change the viewer would not be able to tell the difference between the two shows. "The Cleveland Show" presents Rallo Tubbs (Mike Henry), Roberta Tubbs (Reagan Gomez-Preston), and Cleveland Jr, who remind us an awful lot of Stewie, Meg, and Chris Griffin. Rallo, like Stewie, plays the young mischievous child of the family, who may not be an intellectual genius, but also disobeys his mother and gets kicked out of school. Roberta, the more attractive version of Meg, presents the typical teenage issues Meg illustrates in "Family Guy." Cleveland Jr. may be the most like his "Family Guy" counterpart Chris Griffin. Both characters represent the large and kind of slow brothers, who throw in a punch line here and there. The relationship between Donna and Cleveland also mirrors that of Louis and Peter. Cleveland portrays the larger, less attractive husband like Peter. Donna is the smart and attrative house wife, who presents sex appeal, like Louis. "The Cleveland show even offers us talking animals, presenting Clevelands neighbor, the bear, Tim, who reminds us a lot of "Family Guy's" talking dog, Brian. Both characters also share the same voice of Seth MacFarlane. Who else seems to be missing? Oh, yes, Peter's gang Quagmire, Joe, and Cleveland are also present as Tim the Bear, Lester Krinklesac, and Holt, who all also meet in a bar for drinks and random discussions.

The character list is not the only thing that seems awfully familiar from "Family Guy." The type of humour the show presents is identical. Both shows are offensive, with random cutaways, and make critiques on American culture. "The Cleveland Show" even offers the musical elements of "Family Guy", this time featuring interludes of 80's music.

Although "The Cleveland Show" is entertaining and better than what most of television has to offer, it appears to be nothing more than a copy of the already existing "Family Guy." Seth MacFarlane needs to step up his game and not get too comfortable with his style of humour. After so many reruns of "Family Guy" and now the back to back showing of episodes of "The Cleveland Show" and "Family Guy" it all starts to get a little old.

"Where the Wild Things Are" (Directed by Spike Jonze, 2009)

Definitely one of the best movies of the year. Spike Jonze delivers a visually compelling master piece. This film will bring you back to your childhood with all the imagination, nonsense, and raw emotions that come along with it. The movie features Max Records as Max, a little disobedient boy. It works perfectly as an adaptation of Maurice Sendak's classic children's story.

One of the first things to mention would have to be the raw camera angles within the film. The camera expertly follows Max's crazy rampages never missing a moment of fun. If that does not get you maybe the setting will. Apart from the first few scene, which take place in reality, the entire movie is shot outdoors in a forest or at a beach. It truly takes you back to the simple fun you can have with nothing more than the outdoors and your imagination. Still not convinced, then the amazing graphics of the Wild Things will do the trick. Each monster is created with their own unique characteristics and match personality. It is important to remember that the film takes place within Max's imagination, therefor all of the Wild Things represent various aspects of his own personality. This is what makes the movie so great. It offers a lightness perfect for kids but then it also portrays a deeper level of thinking for the adults.

Max Records does an amazing job playing Max, the King of the Wild Things. He truly is wild when he makes a scene in front of his Mom's boyfriend and bites her while yelling that he'll eat her up. Forest Whitaker and Catherine O'Hare also do awesome jobs playing the voices of Wild Things Ira and Judith.

Even the soundtrack of this movie fits every emotion perfectly, featuring Karen O and the Kids. With their light melodies and chants they fully capture the heart of every scene.

Extremely original, this movie takes you on the wild journey through Max's imagination into the world of the Wild Things. It will make you laugh and cry, but most importantly it will make you feel like a kid again. Once the movie is over all you will want to do is get up and run through the aisles yelling " Let the wild rumpus start!"

"Almost Famous" ( Directed by Cameron Crowe, 2000)

EditCameron Crowe's 2000 hit movie "Almost Famous" displays the story of a young high-school boy who receives the opportunity to write for Rolling Stone Magazine while touring with the up and coming rockback, Stillwater. The film features Kate Hudson, Billy Crudup, and Patrick Fugit. Rock n' Roll maybe the only way to describe this film of teenage angst and self discovery. Throughout the fill William Miller (Fugit) attempts to interview band leader Russell Hammond to complete his story for the Rolling Stone. "Almost Famous" portrays the critic as someone who should "Experience it. Enjoy it. Just don't fall for it." In other words a critic should never get to personal with the artist of the work he is reviewing.

Throughout the film Jeff Bebe (Jason Lee) gives the bulk of Stillwater's interview, ironically though he also remains the most suspicious of Miller. An art critic has the ability to make or break the reputation of a band which is why Bebe may have been on his guard. By touring with the band Miller was able to receive an inside scoop on the band a normal fan would never receive. Typically people listen to the music and go to the concerts but they never actually become friends with the artists. This gives them the ability to ruthlessly take apart and criticize the piece of art. Within "Almost Famous" Miller is faced with the difficult decision to give the world the honest truth on Stillwater or to glorify the band and write what they would want him to write about the band. In the end he chooses to write the truth which is what every critic should do.

Throughout the movie Lester Bangs acts as a mentor to Miller giving him tips on the Rock n' Roll world. He advises Miller not to become too close of friends with the band because it only makes it that much more difficult to write the truth.

The film also gives incite on the life of a "Bandaid" also known as groupies. Kate Hudson plays Penny Lane a Bandaid who has a relationship with Russell, the leader guitarist of Stillwater. Their relationship has to remain somewhat of a seceret because Russel has a girlfriend back home. It touches on the troubles that come with fame, while portraying the story of growing up and being a teenager.

Sex, drugs, and Rock n' Roll or rock criticism is what this movie gives you. With a classic soundtrack featuring The Who, Black Sabbath, and Led Zeppelin. This movie will remind you of the glory days of Rock n' Roll.

Erykah Badu "New Amerykah : Part One (4th World War)" (Universal Motown, 2008) (REDO)

Erykah Badu's latest album "New Amerykah: Part One" presents the first of an installment of a series of albums to come. It breaks the conventional boundaries of R&B and hip-hop, with production by Madlib, Karriem Riggins, and 9th Wonder. Badu displays she is unafraid to experiment with her music by presenting funky-electro beats and jazzy horns, which compliment Badu's eclectic style. Unlike most other R&B artists who only sing the same old love songs over and over again, Badu tackles social issues such as poverty, corruption, and religion within her songs. The title "New Amerykah: Part One (4th World War)" integrates Badu's first name with America referring to an internal struggle between herself and society. New Amerykah qualifies as one of Badu's most personal and politically charged albums to date.

Badu challenges the idea that hip-hop is dead through her second track, "The Healer/Hip Hop" claiming that "It's bigger than religion," the people, and the government. With its melodic chants and chimes the track calls out to its audience, "We aint dead yet," bringing back the true roots of hip-hop. Rather than making a generic track about the death of hip-hop Badu resurrects the original notions of free form expression present in hip-hop.

The next track on the album "Me," gets personal, revealing some of Badu's insecurities. She does this in away that allows her to liberate herself of those faults, and delivers a message which celebrates individuality. Much of the album flows like a train of though or a doodle of the subconscious mind, lacking much structure. Most of the tracks contain repetitive chants allowing the listener to lose themselves within the music and their own subconscious. The listener experiences a form of religious or spiritual experience by listening to "New Amerykah: Part One," because of the various layers and forms. Within the track "Me" Badu relates herself to the National Representative of the Nation of Islam and critic to American society, Louis Farrakahan. "New Amerykah: Part One" also makes many bold critiques in a similar manner as Farrakahan.
With tracks such as "The Cell" Erykah speaks on issues of drugs, poverty, and corruption. She attempts to make the listener aware of these issues while trying to promote a change in society.

The sound of "New Amerykah: Part One" also differs from Erykah's previous work. Her use of electro-beats gives the album a fresh futuristic feel. She also experiments with some Eastern hip-hop sounds on tracks such as "The Healer/Hip Hop."

The final track on the album, "Honey" presents Erykah's only single of the album. "Honey" does not exactly fit with the rest of the album. Just as the title suggests "Honey" displays a sweet love song, lacking any personal or political references.

"New Amerykah: Part One" displays an evolved Erykah Badu. Much of the album flows like a dream, but each with underlying deeper meanings. The album speaks on many socio-political issues while remaining personal and even a little sweet. The album offers many fresh sounds and continues to remind us why Erykah Badu is a leading pioneer in the world of hip-hop.

Erykah Badu "New Amerykah : Part One (4th World War)" (Universal Motown, 2008)

Erykah Badu's latest album "New Amerykah: Part One" presents the first of hopefully a series of two or three more albums to come. This album qualifies as her most intimate and politically charged albums to date. The album features production by Madlib, Karriem Riggins, and 9th Wonder with funky electro beats and jazzy horns which compliment Erykah's eclectic style. "New Amerykah: Party One" presents a confident 38-year-old woman; unafraid to take risks and experiment with her music. With previous seductive albums suchs as "Baduizm" and "Mama's Gun," Erykah takes a turn with "New Amerykah: Part One" tackling social issues such as poverty, corruption, and religion. Even the title of the album (4th World War) reminds us of the bold statements being made within the music.

Eryakh challenges the idea that Hip-Hop is dead through her second track " The Healer/Hip Hop, " by claiming that "it's bigger than religion," the people, and the government. With its melodic chants and chimes the track calls out to its audience, " we aint dead yet," making the listener want to get up and make the world awaare of their existence. Erykah continues to critique the government and speak out to the people with tracks such as "Soldier" and "The Cell."

From the very beginning Erykah gets personal, especially with the third track "Me." This track acts as an autobiography/confessional to the listener. Erykah softly sings of her faults but would still rather be herself than any other way. "Me" allows the listener to become intimate with Erykah while delivering a message of individuality. Much of the album flows like a train of thought or a doodle of a the subconscious mind, lacking much structure. Many of the tracks present repetitive chants making the album itself feel like a form of religious experience. The free form of the album leaves room for thought, allowing the listener to fully digest Erykah's messages. She even relates herself to the National Representative of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan, on the track "Me" where she claims "you [ Farrakhan] are me." She presents many of his views within her songs.

What makes "New Amerykah: Part One" different from her previous albums includes her use of electro-beats throughout many of the tracks. The beats give the album a fresh, futuristic feel. The album does offer some old school Erykah with the final track honey which does not exactly fit with the rest of the album. Ironically, "Honey" appears as Erykah's first and only single for the album.

"New Amerykah: Part One" displays an Erykah Badu that has evolved over time. Much of the tracks flow like a dream but each with underlying deeper meanings. The album speaks on the poor condition of society at the moment. It leaves room for many questions and also offers some fresh sounds for the ear from the usual empty pop music played on the radio.

"I Can Do Bad All By Myself" (Directed by Tyler Perry 2009)

Tyler Perry does it again, bringing back his famous character Madea in his latest play turned film "I Can Do Bad All By Myself". The movie features Tyler Perry, obviously as Madea and Joe, Taraji Henson ( The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Smokin' Aces, Hustle and Flow) as April, a lonely bar singer, and rising star Adam Rodriguez ( A Kiss of Chaos, Caught in the Cross Fire) as Sandino. If your already a Tyler Perry fan this is a must see hit presenting all of the Tyler Perry qualities of church, family, music, and love.
From the beginning the movie will capture you with Taraji Henson's beautiful voice, as she opens in a night club. You soon discover that things are not always as beautiful as they seem, which is especially true in April's case. April portrays a lonely drunk without hope, family, or love. The film carries these themes with a strong musical cast of gospel singers Marvin Winans as Pastor Brian, and Gladys Knight as family friend Wilma. Both singers will touch your heart as they sing they pains of everyday life. But, they are not the only musical talent within the film. Tyler Perry also presents 10 time Grammy winner Mary J. Blige as Tanya, one of April's only true friends. Blige will blow away audiences with her amazing and inspirational performance of " I can do bad all by myself" which captures the heart and soul of the film.
Yes, Madea is back, this time without a gun and a smaller role, but with just as much force. Madea acts as a mentor to three orphan children who recently lost their Grandmother. The children attempt to break into Madeas home when she snatches them up and returns them to their Aunt April. Madea does all this with great comedy. Even the kids poke fun at Madea, answering to her with "Yes, Man" rather than "Yes Ma'am", as she attempts to straighten them up and teach them some manners. Madea brings a lighter side to a film which covers many heavy topics.
Tyler Perry also presents the fresh face of Adam Rodriguez as Sandino to his cast. Sandino represents the good man every woman searches for. He works as a handyman in Aprils house while she gives him a place to stay. Sandino also faced a rough childhood but overcomes through love, God, and family. He works to free April of her demons, allowing her to finally let love back into her life. Sandino and April make you feel the strong loving bond of the true love between them.
"I Can Do Bad All By Myself" displays a film which encourages the importance of family and giving back to the community. Even for people who feel they have lost all hope this movie shows what the power of lover can do. This movie will bring you to tears and laughter. Most importantly this film will allow you to remember that " hope is closer than you think."

Good Review vs. Bad Review

What makes a movie review good or bad? With sites such as Blogger.com, Rottentomatoes.com, and Yelp.com anyone can become a critic, but that does not make everyone a good critic. Both Austin G. and Lisa Schwarzbaum wrote critics on Quentin Tarantino's latest film, Inglourious Bastards, but only Lisa's review properly critics the film.
Austin G's critic on Inglourious Bastards can be found at Rottentomatoes.com, along with hundreds of other horrible reviews. Austin's review does not work as a good review because of its short length, poor grammar, and little knowledge of the film. The first thing to notice about Austin G's poor review includes the unprofessional appearance of his blog. Once your click onto his blog you notice that he fails to use a title to introduce this review. The review is barley composed of 150 words, while missing an introduction and conclusion. The body of the review only mentions two characters, giving broad generalizations about the film. A good critic should have a thorough understanding of their subject, which should give them much to say about their topic. Austin compares the film to other Taratino films, but fails to mention how Inglourious Bastards relates to those films. The review also contains many typos such as " it still holds it's owns as probably as movie of the year" causing confusion and frustration to the reader. He claims parts of the film "[were] already played out in a lot of other movies", but never mentions which other films. He does not provide proper evidence for his accusations. Towards the end of his review Austin mentions several negative aspects of the film, but concludes the review by telling readers to go see the movie. A critic should not contradict themselves within their own review. Overall, Austin's review proves to be a waste of time and is not worth reading.
Lisa Schwarzbaum's review, found at EW.com, displays a well written film review. Her review provides a thorough understanding of the film, with attention to the details. She begins with a well written introduction which gives the reader a quick plot summary of the film. She continues by analyzing the title of the film. She properly references and inserts quotes throughout her review, allowing the reader to easily follow and understand her review. Within her review Lisa mentions several important scenes and characters without giving away major plot secrets of the film. Lisa also manages to comment on the films set and soundtrack, reviewing every aspect of the film. Halfway through the review Lisa relates specific characteristics of Lieut. Aldo Raines to outside references. This gives the reader a better understanding of the nature of the characters within the film. Lisa writes her review with a great knowledge of cinematography and a broad vocabulary. She also shows understanding of the director and his past films by comparing Inglourious Bastards to his past works. Lisa's review gives the reader a good incite on the film and makes them eager to watch it.
In order to make a review work the critic must sit and take their time while writing the review. With constant, fast Internet access critics often become to eager to voice their opinion quickly, rather than properly. A good review gives the reader proper understanding of what is to be expected of a certain product.


Austin G.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/user/722170/reviews/view.php?type=2&id=1200615


Lisa Schwarzbaum
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20297351,00.html